of ecuadorian football federation (FEF) last Sunday, all legal debate try to reverse the resolution of FIFA Arbitration Court minus (TAS) 3 points in the next qualifier given that it is inconsistent, ambiguous and unfair.

“Ecuador go together full power when fighting the solution TAS Because I understand it’s contradictory, ambiguous and unfair,” he said. Francisco Egas president of FEF to the program Mark 90 of interactive digital channel.

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) EFF You will lose points for the next qualifying round and will be fined CHF 100,000 (87 million pesos). Chile world Peru before it is supposed irregularity Nationality of Players Byron Castillo .

“legally which is understood to lack resolution Robustness For they are two completely contradictory arguments. Resolution “Egas designation.

However, in its first article on the sanctions, the TAS indicated that Castillo was not in doubt of his eligibility to be part of the Ecuadorian team, thus indicating that Ecuador had not violated Article 22 of the FIFA Disciplinary Regulations. I was.

According to the resolution, “the player was eligible to play for the Ecuadorian team because the Ecuadorian authorities recognized him (Castillo) as an Ecuadorian citizen.”

The president of the FEF is TAS within 30 days from that moment “I filed a request for revocation with the Swiss court, and then if that doesn’t work, the court has another case human rights Overturn that decision. ”

For Egus,we have a very strong case both in Switzerland and in Switzerland, working with various law firms. european courts defend Ecuador of rulings that are considered to be inconsistent legal aid .