Despite the efforts of journalists and space hosts, neither Daniel Matamara nor Macarena Pizarro were able to mediate the dispute. The controversy arose after Bellorio accused the proposed constitution of “undermining the police” by not mentioning the Carabinero.
A tense moment was experienced Thursday night Chilean debate After discussion with program guests Jaime Bellorio (UDI), Ximena Rincon (DC), Barbara Sepulveda (PC) and Vlad Milosevic (PL), at CHV, On the role of the police in the proposed constitution.
Space hosts Macarena Pizarro and Daniel Matamala were unable to mediate a heated exchange. They couldn’t stop the crossing.
Space has analyzed the security issues of the document proposed as the Magna Carta. The former secretary-general of the government at the time “This constitution undermines the police force.”
Space journalist Macarena Pizarro decided to speak on this point. “Why would that undermine the police?” he asked. “The carabiner has no name.”
It was then that Sepulveda responded immediately.very rough They claim that when we say “police” we mean that all branches of the military have been wiped out.
“They accuse us of lying.”
Shortly after, a constitutional lawyer explains that the proposal aims to improve police deployment and increase the number of troops. By allowing free access to parent schools.
However, as soon as she stops explaining her point, she is intercepted by a former deputy and a senator at the same time. “But no Carabineros” They are mentioned almost in unison. “They accused us of lying all the time, But we don’t see Carabineros’ parent school,” Rincon launched.
At the same time, Belorio points out that “the army only has one” and begins pointing out other proverbs of lawyers, interrupted by communicators who seek to calm down.
“But we’ll go one by one, one by one. Let’s stay on this and go one by one to understand the argument,” mentions Matamara in an effort to calm everyone down.
The journalist then reads the article in question and says,Admission and training for police is free Non-discriminatory in a manner established by law. “
“No mention of carabinero or PDI” Rincon’s comment where you can see Sepulveda’s immediate reaction.
“they are the police, senators Armed forces are army, navy, and air force,” she notes absentmindedly, and when Beliolio speaks at the same time, supporters of recognition “They say we are liars, and they themselves are liars.” Generate reactions with Sepulveda and Milosevic.
“But it says ‘police’ there,” Pissarro tries to explain. “If they weren’t carabiners and detectives, what other police could there be?” Querrier, points out that “there is contempt in Carabineros” while also speaking Belorio and Rincon.
“No, please,” Milosevic says impatiently. ‘What are we lying about? I can’t understand what you’re saying and keep talking.
“James, no.please The carabinero is not explicitly mentioned. He talks about the ‘police’,” says Matamara, who read the article again.
Anyway, the group continues to argue. “It is said that the Carabineros disappear here.” accused Rincon, which was denied by Milosevic.
“Time’s up. A long time ago, when time ran out. We have to move on to the next topic. ” Pizarro interrupted him as he tried to end the moment.
